Archive for the ‘Latest News’ Category

On The Radio

Monday, September 13th, 2010

I will be in Ventura, CA on Friday, Sept. 17th, talking about TESTAROSSA with radio KKZZ AM’s Bill Frank, aka ‘Billy the Brain’  at 10:45 a.m. Pacific time. I will get my 15 minutes of fame, finally! Whew!

They will be taking calls and the interview will stream over the Internet at www.am1400coach.com.

Tune in if you can. Calling in would be even nicer. Testarossa and steroids will be the topic of conversation.

***JUST ADDED***: I will be also be interviewed on the Kevin Slaten show at Sports Radio 1380 AM KSLG in St. Louis. The interview is this Wednesday, September 15 (tomorrow) at 4 p.m. CST, 2 p.m. PST. The show’s website is: http://www.team1380.net/pages/3238533.php

Kevin has been at the forefront of the steroid scandal since it broke, and he is apparently very outspoken. We will be talking Steroids and Testarossa. You can listen live on the site.


September 11, 2001

Sunday, September 12th, 2010

“Not Guilty, your Honor.”

Saturday, September 4th, 2010

These were the words uttered by pitching great Roger Clemens last Thursday when he was indicted for obstructing a congressional investigation and denying, under oath, that he used steroids and Human Growth Hormones (HGH) during his career in baseball.

“I never took HGH or Steroids. And I did not lie to Congress,” he Tweeted after his not-guilty plea. “I look forward to challenging the Governments accusations, and hope people will keep an open mind until trial. I appreciate all the support I have been getting. I am happy to finally have my day in court.”

Clemens. Bonds. Canseco. Sosa. McGwire. The list goes on and on. At the famous 2005 congressional hearing on cracking down on steroid use in baseball, this exchange between Rep. William Lacy Clay (D., Mo.) and McGwire broke my heart:

Rep. Clay: “Mr. McGwire, we are both fathers of young children. Both my son and daughter love sports and they look up to stars like you. Can we look at those children with a straight face and tell them that great players like you play the game with honesty and integrity?”

McGwire: “Like I said earlier, I’m not going to go into the past and talk about my past.”

I remembered vividly McGwire’s young son meeting him at home plate after he surpassed Roger Maris’s home run record. How proud that little boy must have been of his father. How McGwire’s son must feel now after his father, just this year, admitted using steroids and HGH during his playing career.

I, too, have children, both baseball players, both hero worshipers. The theme of steroid use in Testarossa was a direct result of this issue—and McGwire in particular—and the effect it had on my then-ten-year-old-son. I remember the tears in his eyes as he ripped the almost life-sized poster of McGwire down off the wall above his bed, and how, with almost ceremonial care he broke the Hallmark Christmas ornament of the buffed-up Cardinal and threw it in the trash. Is the subject of steroids in sports an interesting topic? If you’re into sports, perhaps it is. Is it a sexy topic for a crime fiction novel? Many publishers who turned Testarossa down agreed that it was not. I think as writers it is our duty to give voice to topics of all kinds, whether sexy or not. When I told a friend recently that the sequel to Testarossa would feature a serial killer, he informed me that serial killers have been done to death (nice pun). Rather than be scared off the topic, I’m vowing to do it better, which is why the sequel is taking so darned long. How about another book about child molesters? I’ll read it if it will shed additional light and keep people talking.

I, and many of us, will look forward to hearing what happens with Mr. Clemens and his future, both as a Hall-of-Famer and as a potential prisoner. One thing is for sure: this subject is not over. I’d love for the day to come when I no longer have to talk about this. Until that day, you’ll be hearing more from me on the subject. Turns out, I may have one or two opportunities to be interviewed on sports radio on the subject of steroids from a mother’s and a writer’s point of view, so perhaps you’ll hear from me again sooner than you think.

I am grateful for the opportunity to write what I feel is important, both here in blog form and in paperback. If I can touch one person and get them to think about steroid use, then I’ve struck gold. Whatever happens beyond that is gravy.

I, as always, welcome your comments.

Guest Blogger

Friday, August 20th, 2010

I will be inviting people from the literary and publishing community to blog here in the near future. There are many writers, publishers, editors and authors out there who have some amazing insights into the world in which I now live. I’m excited to hear from them. I hope you are, too. If you have any desire to contribute, send me a note.

Writing Outside the Lines

Thursday, August 19th, 2010

I’ve said in previous posts that reviews, and the critics who give them, are subjective. They are based on opinion and nothing more. Now, some opinions are given more weight than others: a great review in the New York Times weighs heavier than the one from Harriet in Hoboken on Amazon. Or does it?

While I write in a certain genre, I am a huge fan of the literary novel. So, when I read a novel that I feel is a literary marvel, I talk about it. One such novel is Extremely Loud and Incredibly Close by Jonathan Safran Foer. The story centers on a nine-year old boy, Oskar Schell, whose father died in the 9/11 attacks. He is an odd boy, this Oskar. He wears only white, wears gloves on his hands, and has yet to meet an adverb he didn’t like, hence the title. In the first few pages of Foer’s book, Oskar runs through a litany of ideas—what he calls inventions—that are fascinating and very much beyond his nine years. I was immediately drawn in, wanting to see what he came up with next. What he comes up with next you must read for yourself. You will either love it, or you will hate it.

What I want to focus on here is Foer’s use of different mediums within the confines of a book to tell his story. Foer takes us back and forth between Oskar’s narrative, which consists of his wild inventions and his search for a father who left him too soon. In Oskar, we see a boy hanging on by a thread (he often ‘gives himself a bruise’). He finds a key inside an envelope while searching through his father’s closet post 9/11. It is a heartbreaking scene in which he goes into the closet to get closer to the man whose voice on a phone message tape after the attacks is all he has left to hold on to. On the outside of the envelope is written the word BLACK, and Oskar sets out through the five boroughs of New York to speak to every person named BLACK in an effort to find out how his father died. Foer takes us on a journey through Oskar that is funny and heartbreaking. Foer also tells another story, bringing forth the tragedies of Hiroshima and Dresden through letters written before Oskar’s time. The letters are placed on the page with gaps and misspells and odd formatting that, to me, is a daring and bold way to present literary work. Another page is from an art store Oksar goes to, wishing to speak to the manager about what BLACK could mean. The page is covered in words, all in different colors, like you would find near the pens—people test the pens to see how the color shows up on paper. Foer also has, dispersed throughout the book, photographs of a lone figure—seen so many times after 9/11—falling out of the burning twin towers. With this haunting photo, we are reminded of Oskar’s torture at not knowing how his father perished. Perhaps the answer lies with this key.

Foer takes chances with this book, and coming on the heels of his critically-acclaimed first book, Everything is Illuminated (which I have not read), I can only assume that his agent and his publisher had no qualms about offering a book that was so—out there. Here are some comments about Foer and Extremely Loud and Incredibly close:

“Foer isn’t just a bad author, he’s a vile one,” said the New York Press shortly after Foer’s debut was published. Adding him to the their list of “Most Loathsome New Yorkers”—which he’s been on three times in five years—the paper later fulminated, “Joyce Carol Oates invented this Jewish mother’s wet dream in a Princeton laboratory, and now we have to live in a world where eager-to-please frauds like Foer receive unearned comparisons to geniuses like Burgess and Joyce.”

(www.gawker.com/5583306/jonathan-safran-foer)

And this one-star review from an Amazon reader, titled Extremely Tedious and Incredibly Lacking:

I read the book all the way to the end because I thought that surely there would be a point to page after page after page of precocious non-punctuated musings by this boy. Unfortunately, there was no point to the musings.

I suggest you save your money because there is no closure at the end of the book. It is a rambling, long-winded, and twisted tale.

(www.amazon.com/Extremely-Loud-Incredibly-Close-Novel/product-reviews/0618711651/ref=cm_cr_pr_hist_1?ie=UTF8&showViewpoints=0&filterBy=addOneStar)

Wow, right? I liked Foer’s comment in one interview in which he said the following in response to a comment by the interviewer that a book is more than just a piece of merchandise:

JSF: A book is an intimate object whether you are conscious of it when you are writing it or not. A book is something that is seen with the eyes on a shelf, pulled off the shelf with the hand, taken home. What percentage of people do you think read a book in bed? 80? 90? People read books in bathtubs. People read books in their easy chairs with their glass of wine or their coffee, their cat.

I also liked his comment about the role of reader and reviewer:

JSF: I did a reading last night at Boston College and I was thinking about it. There were more people in the audience than will review my book—in the country. It’s very tempting to attribute too much weight to one kind of person over another. Like, a publisher’s opinion is not more valid than a reader’s opinion. A reviewer’s opinion is not more valid than a reader’s opinion. A reviewer’s opinion is not more valid than a non-reviewing reader’s opinion. It’s just that some people work in areas—carry bigger microphones, basically.

(www.themorningnews.org/archives/personalities/birnbaum_v_jonathan_safran_foer.php)

So, does the great review in the New York Times weigh heavier than the one from Harriet in Hoboken on Amazon? Foer doesn’t seem to think so, which makes me feel a bit less queasy that the LA Times hasn’t yet grabbed onto Testarossa, but Hot Novelist, an Amazon reviewer, loved the book.

With all that said, Foer does something so incredible at the end of the book that it sat in my gut for days after. I will not give it away. I will simply say that for the writing, the gall and the emotional roller coaster that is Extremely Loud and Incredibly Close, it is worth the read. I admire any writer who can go to the edge like Foer did with this book, and make me, a reader, feel the things that I felt.

Do Reviews Really Help?

Thursday, August 12th, 2010

I was in the market for a new coffee pot a while back. I wanted a high-falutin’ one that maintained the water temperature at 120 degrees, produced an even spray over the coffee grounds (because I was told this distributes the flavor evenly, or something), and was no more than 15 ¼ inches tall. I found one. It was the highest ranked coffeemaker on Amazon, as well as on other sites that boasted expertise in such things. I read all the reviews—even the one and two-starred blurbs. I weighed the pros and cons, and after careful debate, I decided that I could handle turning the difficult-to-see dot to the correct position for the perfect pour (Some customers had trouble in this area). Based on such high praise, I spent obscene amounts of money on this miracle appliance, and was so pleased with it that we bought a second one (my husband has recently begun to favor unleaded joe, and I don’t like to wait).

So, how important are product reviews? As a new author, and the creator of a product, I’ll be frank: to me, they are very important. Is it because I believe they are truly helpful? I can state unequivocally that I do (see above). But I also like to know that people like (or not) my book. Look, I’m thrilled about my 5-star reviews on Amazon—all seven—as well as the feedback I have received on Goodreads and that old stand-by, email. I love that people have emailed, or texted, or called to say that they ‘flew through the book’, or, now that they’ve finished reading it, they ‘miss the characters, and hope I’m working on the sequel, and when will it be finished?’ I love hearing that the romance in the book reignited sparks, caused a little tingle in places a tingle hasn’t touched in a while, or simply reaffirmed how love can—and should—feel, even if it is only fiction. I love hearing that the people who love me love the book, and it is an even bigger thrill when people I don’t know discover the book and say they loved it. But I also want to hear where I fall short. What didn’t you get? Where was I unclear? What didn’t ring true? I had one reviewer say that, at first, the chapter prefaces—John Testarossa’s backstory—was confusing, but she soon caught on and ended up enjoying that part very much. May I share that both my agent and my editor hated those chapter prefaces, and at least one publisher, in passing on the manuscript, mentioned the backstory was not a highlight for her, either. I took them out and added them back a few times before the book was published. I realized that perhaps the reason why I was receiving such feedback was not because the chapter prefaces, or backstory, was a bad idea, but that perhaps the failure was in the execution. I focused on making those chapter prefaces the best they could be, because I believed they were an integral part of the story. John Testarossa is the man he is because of the boy he was, and I wanted the reader to feel that, connect with it. I worked hard in the many rewrites and edits to make that part of the story clear, because the feedback told me I had fallen short. On the other hand, two police officers read the book and shared with me that the story rang very true for them—one even asked if I was a cop. That was some incredible feedback. It confirmed that the most difficult part of the story, for me, was done well. That was a relief. I can write the love. The other is hard work, and I got it, ‘nailed it’. The men who work the job told me so.

Now that I’m a published author, I review more. I see now how important it is, and I do it even when I can’t exactly give the highest praise. I don’t read as a reader anymore, sadly. I read as a writer, so I am most critical of bad writing. I work incredibly hard at the writing—I make sure you can smell the decomposing body, feel the ache in your chest over the loss of a life, or feel that dip in your stomach as the most intimate words are spoken at that perfect moment. Did the writer put you there, or was it more like a fly-by? What gives me the greatest pleasure, of course, is sharing with potential buyers of a book what thrilled me the most, what made me not want to put it down, and what I admired about the writing. In the end, it is all very subjective—it is opinion. My taste is not yours, and vice versa. In the end, we give our opinion, and hope that we can help our favorite authors sell a few more books if the opinion is favorable. Know that I take reviews very seriously, and I appreciate the time it takes to write a thoughtful one. All authors do.

Take the time to review your favorite books—not just mine, although you can feel free to do that, too. Share that intimate relationship you had with that book with the rest of us. I want to know what you loved about the book you love—and what you hated. Drop me a note and tell me what your favorites are, and why. And then direct me to your review. I’d love to read it.

On Testarossa

Monday, July 12th, 2010

I often wonder how my favorite authors come up with their characters. To me, characters drive the book. I have read books where the story has intrigued me enough to buy the book, but once I get into it I find that the characters are one-dimensional, or they all sound the same, or they have no redeeming qualities. When this is the case, I find that the story that once intrigued me has now left me cold.

I knew that I wanted Testarossa to be character-driven. I wanted John Testarossa to be a good man, but a flawed one. I wanted John to be the man all men want to be, and all women want to sleep with. I wanted him to be at his best when dealing with the victims of crimes, and at his worst when hurt or in doubt, or when he can’t right a wrong. I wanted him to live hard, work hard, and love hard. I wanted him to feel the pain of a childhood he could not control, and attempt to find a place for the hurt and betrayal, while we sat back and watched. In short, John is who I would be if I were a man. I wrote the book in first-person for this reason.

I wanted Dr. Karen Gennaro to be beautiful, and smart, and sexy, and headstrong. I wanted to show the dichotomy of the strong, intelligent, independent woman who falls hard for a man who is conservative, take-charge, and reactionary. John Testarossa is a man she is drawn to, yet she fights against those very traits that draw her, believing a woman like her cannot possibly love a man like him. He is not like the men of today; he is of another time, and Karen is uncontrollably drawn in. He takes care of her, he cherishes her, and she knows, deep down, that this is what she wants—and needs. In Testarossa and Gennaro, I wanted to show two people who love each other despite their individual flaws, two people who are more alike than they care to admit, two people who want the same things, they just go about it differently. Karen is the person I wish I was.

Alex Ortiz is the antithesis of John. He’s calm, organized, and dispassionate about his work. He has an intelligence for the job that is not evident right away, but John knows, and he trusts and admires Alex more than anyone in his life. Alex, in turn, understands John, understands his ambition, and understands what lies beneath, even if he doesn’t know the specifics. John sees in Alex and his family something he wishes he had but believes that, at this point in his life, that kind of normalcy is unachievable. I based the character of Alex Ortiz and his family on some friends I greatly admire. I hope they don’t mind the intrusion.

The other characters—Mark Gonzales, Amelia Carter, Captain Dale B. are all amalgams of various people, both real and fictional. But the one minor character I have the greatest affection for is Junie Joo, the hapless transgender who will continue to vex the two detectives and charm the readers for many books to come. I love this character, and sadly, I know none like her.

I would love to hear your take on the characters portrayed in Testarossa. How did they affect you? Do you believe strong characters can drive a book? What are some of your favorite character-driven books, and why?

On Writing

Thursday, July 8th, 2010

People who have known me a long time are asking how I got into writing. After all, my closest friends know me as a mom, or the Parent Association President at my children’s school for six years, or the Human Resources professional who worked at Paramount Pictures for ten years, or the student who studied Psychology in college. When, they all want to know, did I start writing? After all, I certainly wasn’t brooding under a tree with pen and notebook in high school, nor was I sneaking off to write stories while recruiting secretaries at Paramount. And when asked that first time, I really had to think about it.

I guess it started about seven years ago, while I still had my little one at home. I became frustrated with a TV show I’d once loved, and now loathed beyond reason, due to the bad writing and plot development. A once decent show was becoming the joke of dramatic TV, and no one was doing anything about it, so I decided to try. I began writing fan fiction. For those who aren’t familiar, fan fiction is writing/stories based on material already created, such as TV shows, movies, books, Anime, comics, etc. None of the characters belong to the fan fiction writer, and that is understood up front—the writer is using characters already created by someone else, in stories they make up, for entertainment purposes only, and not for financial gain. There are sights all over the Internet devoted to fan fiction, and many are show/movie/book-specific. I thought about the direction I, as a fan, would like to see this show go, and what I would do if I were on the writing staff. And then I wrote.

I got minimal but positive feedback from other fans, and then one day when I sat down at the computer, instead of writing about characters someone else thought up, I began the first pages of Testarossa. I knew the kind of hero I wanted, the kind of man I wanted him to be. I knew there would be a love story, and I knew that we would learn about this character through day-to-day police work and his day-to-day life, and not necessarily focus on one crime or theme. I wanted the book to be character-driven rather than plot driven. I knew no more than this.

The first draft of Testarossa is laughable—but only I get to laugh. Every other sentence ended with an exclamation point. I had too many commas and not enough paragraph breaks. I spelled ‘missus’ ‘misses’. But, oh my God, these characters jumped off the page! I loved them. And then came the night that I woke up at one a.m., got out of bed, and wrote what those who have read the book now know as ‘Chapter 15’. I cried as I wrote it, and I knew then that if I was crying, my readers would be, too, and that was what I wanted more than anything—to make the reader feel.

Many edits and rewrites later, and the Testarossa you have now is a grown-up version, a more matured version of that baby I created seven years ago. I’ve taken classes and learned where my personal deep voice lies, because if I can find my deep voice, I will find John’s. And that, my friends, is where the gold is found. My hope is that when you read the book, it will take you away for a little while; make you laugh, make you cry, make you shudder, but most of all, make you want to read it again in a year, and maybe recommend it to the people you care about.

This is my hope.

Hello world!

Thursday, June 10th, 2010

WELCOME TO MY BLOG!  Check back soon!

Test text Test link