Posts Tagged ‘Gennaro’

The Double Whammy of the Two-Genre Novel

Thursday, November 4th, 2010

I began my love affair with books—the-holding-on-to-them-in-my-heart-and-soul-long-after-I-read-them kind of affair—in childhood. I clung to certain genres—horror (Stephen King), crime and police procedurals (Joseph Wambaugh), and romance (Sidney Sheldon, Barbara Taylor Bradford, and Judith Kranz). When I wanted one, I went there; when I wanted the other, I went over there. I’m hard pressed to recall even a smooch between characters in any King or Wambaugh novel, and I guess with the exception of The Other Side of Midnight, by Sidney Sheldon, there wasn’t a crime in the forefront of any of the romance novels I enjoyed. So, when I set out to write Testarossa, I vowed to change that.

Admittedly, I came to the writing game late in life. Combining genres has certainly been done prior to my arrival on the scene, but being a particular fan of the crime fiction genre, I didn’t see a strong show of romance in anything I read, and if I did, it was in the form of the revolving door into Stone Barrington’s bedroom in the Stuart Woods novels, or the frustrating relationship Jesse Stone had with his ex-wife in the Robert Parker series. Because I believe cops fall in love, and are capable of staying in love, despite the grisly careers they’ve chosen, I decided to include a very strong romance in my otherwise crimey crime novel, Testarossa.

When all was said and done, and my agent and my editor liked the book well enough, they both said, OK, now what? What are you? They both came up with romance-suspense. Well, OK, so…I’m next to Jude Deveraux at Borders? Uh, have you two read chapter 12, the one with the decaying body and the Hefty bag reference? Don’t knock it, they both said. Romance –suspense is all the rage now. I was nervous. I saw myself as a crime fiction writer, in the vein of Robert Crais, and my hero, Joe Wambaugh. I wanted to at least be on the same side of the bookstore as those two. Alas, I’m not in any bookstore, but that’s not my point. My point is, I think certain genres work well together, and as readers, we benefit most of all.

While these two genres are not my cup of tea, I know for a fact that science fiction and fantasy are the latest combo to hit it big. Another combo, and this has become my all-time favorite, is literary crime fiction. Read just the first few pages of chapter one of R.J. Ellory’s A Quiet Belief in Angels, and you sense something special is taking place. No longer are we burdened with a teller of stories; this man is a storyteller, and he hooks you from the get-go with alluring words and smart sentence structure. Ellory is an incredibly gifted writer. Again, we, the reader, benefit. I am currently reading the debut novel The Poison Tree by Erin Kelly, and will be reviewing it soon for Suspense Magazine. Another superb writer, another engaging crime story, and I am immersed.

I wrote Testarossa as a crime novel first. Then up popped that pesky romance—and it’s a big one. I devote a good third of the book to the relationship between John Testarossa and Karen Gennaro. They fight, they make love, they talk, they banter, they play, they cry, they laugh, they eat—oh, boy, do they eat—and to me, their relationship is real and it’s complicated and it’s sexy and it’s hot. And then there’s the crime, or crimes, that John and his partners have to contend with, cases they have to solve. I think it works, as do those who have read and reviewed the book. Testarossa is getting attention, both as a book of crime fiction, and as a romance.

As readers, and as writers, we have options, and I like them. Want a little fantasy with your sci-fi? Here. Want a little love with your crime? Here ya go. A little literary with your murder and mayhem? We got ya covered. I like this.

I guess maybe, if I were in Barnes and Noble, they’d have to create a new shelf for writers like me – Crime/Romance. Oh! Or, better yet, stick Testarossa in both crime and romance. Now, there’s an idea.

On Testarossa

Monday, July 12th, 2010

I often wonder how my favorite authors come up with their characters. To me, characters drive the book. I have read books where the story has intrigued me enough to buy the book, but once I get into it I find that the characters are one-dimensional, or they all sound the same, or they have no redeeming qualities. When this is the case, I find that the story that once intrigued me has now left me cold.

I knew that I wanted Testarossa to be character-driven. I wanted John Testarossa to be a good man, but a flawed one. I wanted John to be the man all men want to be, and all women want to sleep with. I wanted him to be at his best when dealing with the victims of crimes, and at his worst when hurt or in doubt, or when he can’t right a wrong. I wanted him to live hard, work hard, and love hard. I wanted him to feel the pain of a childhood he could not control, and attempt to find a place for the hurt and betrayal, while we sat back and watched. In short, John is who I would be if I were a man. I wrote the book in first-person for this reason.

I wanted Dr. Karen Gennaro to be beautiful, and smart, and sexy, and headstrong. I wanted to show the dichotomy of the strong, intelligent, independent woman who falls hard for a man who is conservative, take-charge, and reactionary. John Testarossa is a man she is drawn to, yet she fights against those very traits that draw her, believing a woman like her cannot possibly love a man like him. He is not like the men of today; he is of another time, and Karen is uncontrollably drawn in. He takes care of her, he cherishes her, and she knows, deep down, that this is what she wants—and needs. In Testarossa and Gennaro, I wanted to show two people who love each other despite their individual flaws, two people who are more alike than they care to admit, two people who want the same things, they just go about it differently. Karen is the person I wish I was.

Alex Ortiz is the antithesis of John. He’s calm, organized, and dispassionate about his work. He has an intelligence for the job that is not evident right away, but John knows, and he trusts and admires Alex more than anyone in his life. Alex, in turn, understands John, understands his ambition, and understands what lies beneath, even if he doesn’t know the specifics. John sees in Alex and his family something he wishes he had but believes that, at this point in his life, that kind of normalcy is unachievable. I based the character of Alex Ortiz and his family on some friends I greatly admire. I hope they don’t mind the intrusion.

The other characters—Mark Gonzales, Amelia Carter, Captain Dale B. are all amalgams of various people, both real and fictional. But the one minor character I have the greatest affection for is Junie Joo, the hapless transgender who will continue to vex the two detectives and charm the readers for many books to come. I love this character, and sadly, I know none like her.

I would love to hear your take on the characters portrayed in Testarossa. How did they affect you? Do you believe strong characters can drive a book? What are some of your favorite character-driven books, and why?